Re: RLS Design
От | Brightwell, Adam |
---|---|
Тема | Re: RLS Design |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAKRt6CSyeq4=YgoSo+nvEKSngk9313-xB4TuqEf2byM4B7tK0Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: RLS Design (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom,
Thanks for the feedback.
Thanks,
Thanks for the feedback.
20MB messages to the list aren't that friendly. Please don't do that
again, unless asked to.
Apologies, I didn't realize it was so large until after it was sent. At any rate, it won't happen again.
FWIW, the above syntax is a nonstarter, at least unless we're willing to
make POLICY a reserved word (hint: we're not). The reason is that the
ADD/DROP COLUMN forms consider COLUMN to be optional, meaning that the
column name could directly follow ADD; and the column type name, which
could also be just a plain identifier, would directly follow that. So
there's no way to resolve the ambiguity with one token of lookahead.
This actually isn't just bison being stupid: in fact, you simply
cannot tell whether
ALTER TABLE tab ADD POLICY varchar(42);
is an attempt to add a column named "policy" of type varchar(42), or an
attempt to add a policy named "varchar" with quals "42".
Ok. Make sense and I was afraid that was the case.
Adam
--
Adam Brightwell - adam.brightwell@crunchydatasolutions.com
Database Engineer - www.crunchydatasolutions.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: