Re: to_timestamp docs
От | Arthur Zakirov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: to_timestamp docs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAKNkYnzvLqz0n6m37W_pX0547pzCE-PepEPs5gNexy7n-+kZJw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: to_timestamp docs (Arthur Zakirov <a.zakirov@postgrespro.ru>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 1:03 AM Arthur Zakirov <a.zakirov@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 12:49 AM Alexander Korotkov > <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > > Actually, FX takes effect on subsequent format patterns. This is not > > documented, but it copycats Oracle behavior. Sure, normally FX should > > be specified as the first item. We could document current behavior or > > restrict specifying FX not as first item. This is also not new in 12, > > so documenting current behavior is better for compatibility. > > I went to Oracle's documentation. It seems that the behavior is > slightly different. > Their documentation says: > > "A modifier can appear in a format model more than once. In such a case, > each subsequent occurrence toggles the effects of the modifier. Its effects are > enabled for the portion of the model following its first occurrence, and then > disabled for the portion following its second, and then reenabled for > the portion > following its third, and so on." What about the patch I attached? It fixes the explanation of FX option a little. -- Arthur Zakirov Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com Russian Postgres Company
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: