Re: [PATCH] Generic type subscripting
От | Arthur Zakirov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Generic type subscripting |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAKNkYnzpMwx0KtLCaOoFVGQZoJHJ5E+mTrZGEcary0eKu2LdLg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Generic type subscripting (Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2017-03-28 19:31 GMT+03:00 Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>: > On 28 March 2017 at 12:08, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Wow, I didn't notice that, sorry - will fix it shortly. > > So, here is the corrected version of the patch. Thank you! The patch looks good to me. But it is not applied :) I think it is because of new FTS functions for jsonb. The patch need rebasing. But, from my point of view, it would be nice if the code mentioned earlier was improved: > + foreach(l, sbsref->reflowerindexpr) > + { > + List *expr_ai = (List *) lfirst(l); > + A_Indices *ai = (A_Indices *) lfirst(list_tail(expr_ai)); > + > + subexpr = (Node *) lfirst(list_head(expr_ai)); It is necessary for arrays of course because of logic mentioned in the documentation. > If any dimension is written as a slice, i.e., contains a colon, then all dimensions are treated as slices. Any dimensionthat has only a single number (no colon) is treated as being from 1 to the number specified. But it would be better if SubscriptingRef structure had a new field of List type. This field can store list of booleans, which means is there slices or not. I think it can improve readability of the code. -- Arthur Zakirov Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com Russian Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: