Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Not able to create collation on Windows
От | Murtuza Zabuawala |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Not able to create collation on Windows |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAKKotZTZw9dAicmxB6j5sApcehtP3_JWEJa-WnRJaix80peWYQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Not able to create collation on Windows (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Not able to create collation on Windows
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Tom,
Yes, I was able to create collation using "C" instead of "POSIX" on windows,
CREATE COLLATION public.test from pg_catalog."C";
--
Regards,
Murtuza Zabuawala
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 9:09 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 8/1/17 10:53, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think this is actually a bug, because the collations code clearly
>> means to allow clones of the C/POSIX locales --- see eg lc_collate_is_c,
> You seem to say that we should support a "POSIX" locale even on systems
> where the C library does not support that. I'm not convinced about that.
Uh, we already do. Note all the regression tests that unconditionally
assume that the POSIX collation works. Also, I am confused by your
apparent belief that there might somewhere be a version of libc that
fails to provide C-locale-compliant behavior. Surely nobody would
tolerate a version of strcmp() that fails to act per C spec.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: