Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
| От | David Rowley |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAKJS1f_yO3nytivqsMQMnyOMG6vU6FOMdz8HLqispEY+eApLOg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [HACKERS] path toward fasterpartition pruning
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 30 November 2017 at 11:15, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > Committed 0004 after reviewing the code and testing that it seems to > work as advertised. > > 0005 looks like it might need to be split into smaller patches. More > broadly, the commit messages you wrote for for 0005, 0006, and 0008 > don't seem to me to do a great job explaining the motivation for the > changes which they make. They tell me what the patches do, but not > why they are doing it. If there's an email in this thread that > explains that stuff, please point me to it and I'll go back and reread > it more carefully; if not, I think I definitely need some more > explanation both of the mission of each patch and the reason why the > patch set is divided up in the way that it is. Hi Amit, It looks like just 0005 to 0008 remain of this and I see that the v13 0005 patch no longer applies to current master. Are you working on splitting this up as requested by Robert above? I can continue reviewing this once patches are available that apply to current master. Many thanks -- David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: