Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?
От | David Rowley |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAKJS1f_pq_ric3G3fNBNXNR+eD_rv=xmYwNkYOxAy+CZ2Zy-Bg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled? (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?
Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10 May 2018 at 14:01, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > I'm thinking something a bit more radical. First, since partition > pruning is the future and constraint exclusion is soon to be a thing of > the past, we should describe pruning first, and then describe exclusion > in terms of pruning. But... that's not true. The chapter describes inheritance partitioned tables too, and we're not getting rid of constraint exclusion because it's needed for those. However, that might not mean your patch has to be changed. I'd better have a look... -- David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: