Re: Speeding up INSERTs and UPDATEs to partitioned tables
От | David Rowley |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Speeding up INSERTs and UPDATEs to partitioned tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAKJS1f_cbMcgZG1ZZZyHY07uSgdST2RFXz66Hrxmq_4CYoJvuA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Speeding up INSERTs and UPDATEs to partitioned tables (Krzysztof Nienartowicz <krzysztof.nienartowicz@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Speeding up INSERTs and UPDATEs to partitioned tables
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 15 October 2018 at 23:04, Krzysztof Nienartowicz <krzysztof.nienartowicz@gmail.com> wrote: > We see quite prohibitive 5-6x slowdown with native partitioning on in > comparison to trigger based in PG9.5. > This is clearly visible with highly parallel inserts (Can share > flamediagrams comparing the two). Does the 0001 patch here fix the problem? I imagined that it would be the locking of all partitions that would have killed the performance. > This basically excludes native partitioning from being used by us. Do you > think your changes could be backported to PG10? - we checked and this would > need quite a number of changes but given the weight of this change maybe it > could be considered? It's very unlikely to happen, especially so with the 0002 patch, which I've so far just attached as a demonstration of where the performance could end up. -- David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: