Re: Speed up transaction completion faster after many relations areaccessed in a transaction
От | David Rowley |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Speed up transaction completion faster after many relations areaccessed in a transaction |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAKJS1f9zp4g0xBiaeN=7shQAsY-DJD9_7+sbBH-qewGSEPwPsA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: Speed up transaction completion faster after many relations areaccessed in a transaction ("Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>) |
Ответы |
RE: Speed up transaction completion faster after many relations areaccessed in a transaction
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 at 15:05, Tsunakawa, Takayuki <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > (1) > +#define LOCKMETHODLOCALHASH_SHRINK_SIZE 64 > > How about LOCKMETHODLOCALHASH_SHRINK_THRESHOLD, because this determines the threshold value to trigger shrinkage? Codein PostgreSQL seems to use the term threshold. That's probably better. I've renamed it to that. > (2) > +/* Complain if the above are not set to something sane */ > +#if LOCKMETHODLOCALHASH_SHRINK_SIZE < LOCKMETHODLOCALHASH_INIT_SIZE > +#error "invalid LOCKMETHODLOCALHASH_SHRINK_SIZE" > +#endif > > I don't think these are necessary, because these are fixed and not configurable. FYI, src/include/utils/memutils.h doesn'thave #error to test these macros. Yeah. I was thinking it was overkill when I wrote it, but somehow couldn't bring myself to remove it. Done now. > (3) > + if (hash_get_num_entries(LockMethodLocalHash) == 0 && > + hash_get_max_bucket(LockMethodLocalHash) > > + LOCKMETHODLOCALHASH_SHRINK_SIZE) > + CreateLocalLockHash(); > > I get an impression that Create just creates something where there's nothing. How about Init or Recreate? Renamed to InitLocalLoclHash() v5 is attached. Thank you for the review. -- David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: