Re: Ordered Partitioned Table Scans
От | David Rowley |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Ordered Partitioned Table Scans |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAKJS1f9L86y2wN_rTVKi2PM5S0Mnq_wAYS1YVu6R3ymupHObbA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Ordered Partitioned Table Scans (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: Ordered Partitioned Table Scans
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 26 October 2018 at 16:52, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > I recall Ronan Dunklau and Julien Rouhaud had proposed a patch for this > last year, but the partitioning-related planning code hadn't advanced then > as much as it has today, so they sort of postponed working on it. > Eventually their patch was returned with feedback last November. Here's > the link to their email in case you wanted to read some comments their > proposal and patch got, although some of them might be obsolete. > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2401607.SfZhPQhbS4%40ronan_laptop Thanks. I wasn't aware, or ... forgot. Looks like back then was tricky times to be doing this. Hopefully, the dust has settled a little bit now. -- David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: