Re: Runtime pruning problem
От | David Rowley |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Runtime pruning problem |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAKJS1f98o-6-SWWzcfiJO6JAQFu2DnYWBzFVB0x2+u5ub=ASEA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Runtime pruning problem (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: Runtime pruning problem
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 at 13:13, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > When you see this: > > explain select * from t1 where dt = current_date + 400; > QUERY PLAN > ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── > Append (cost=0.00..198.42 rows=44 width=8) > Subplans Removed: 3 > -> Seq Scan on t1_1 (cost=0.00..49.55 rows=11 width=8) > Filter: (dt = (CURRENT_DATE + 400)) > (4 rows) > > Doesn't this give an impression that t1_1 *matches* the WHERE condition > where it clearly doesn't? IMO, contorting explain.c to show an empty > Append like what Hosoya-san suggests doesn't sound too bad given that the > first reaction to seeing the above result is to think it's a bug of > partition pruning. Where do you think the output list for EXPLAIN VERBOSE should put the output column list in this case? On the Append node, or just not show them? -- David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: