Re: Parallel Aggregate
От | David Rowley |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Parallel Aggregate |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAKJS1f93KnK47JEN+Mbw1jLVPjJhXrke57tYsU5swZbR2S=MWA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Parallel Aggregate (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Parallel Aggregate
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 21 March 2016 at 15:48, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > David Rowley wrote: > >> I've rewritten the comment to become: >> >> /* >> * Providing that the estimated size of the hashtable does not exceed >> * work_mem, we'll generate a HashAgg Path, although if we were unable >> * to sort above, then we'd better generate a Path, so that we at least >> * have one. >> */ >> >> How about that? > > I think "Providing" should be "Provided". Both make sense, although I do only see instances of "Provided that" in the source. I'm not opposed to changing it, it just does not seem worth emailing a complete patch to do that, but let me know if you feel differently. -- David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: