Re: Incorrect format in error message
От | David Rowley |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Incorrect format in error message |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAKJS1f8znV8ZJDwxgJJ2TYgDHoNFFSeSkR-C78yOkpmKTKzaAQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Incorrect format in error message (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Incorrect format in error message
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 1 April 2016 at 17:30, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> The attached fixes an error message which is incorrectly using an >> unsigned format specifier instead of a signed one. > > Really though, what > astonishes me about this example is that we allow indexes at all on > system columns other than OID. None of the other ones can possibly > have either a use-case or sensible semantics, can they? We certainly > would not stop to update indexes after changing xmax, for example. As for this part. I really don't see how we could disable this without breaking pg_restore for database who have such indexes. My best thought is to add some sort of warning during CREATE INDEX, like we do for HASH indexes. -- David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: