Re: Needless additional partition check in INSERT?
От | David Rowley |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Needless additional partition check in INSERT? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAKJS1f8vAPFNqoLA03bwK=LwyupMBuh6A472nTC3RkBZwcrxuw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Needless additional partition check in INSERT? (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: Needless additional partition check in INSERT?
Re: Needless additional partition check in INSERT? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thanks for looking On 11 May 2018 at 17:48, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > By the way, > > + !resultRelInfo->ri_PartitionRoot) > > This should be resultRelInfo->ri_PartitionRoot == NULL, because the above > gives an impression that ri_PartitionRoot is a Boolean. If this is some new coding rule, then that's the first I've heard of it. Scanning over the result of git grep -E "if \(!\w{1,}\)" it looks like we have a bit of cleanup work to do before we can comply. FWIW, I've previously been told off for the opposite. -- David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: