Re: executor relation handling
| От | David Rowley |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: executor relation handling |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAKJS1f8cYQP64jsNU1-vLmE9Z1mCx_+0zjCgA_kCWfddmcLz_w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: executor relation handling (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
| Ответы |
Re: executor relation handling
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 1 October 2018 at 19:39, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > For this and the other cases (AcquireRewriteLocks, AcquireExecutorLocks, > etc.), I wonder whether we couldn't just *not* recalculate the lock mode > based on inspecting the query tree to cross-check with rellockmode? Why > not just use rellockmode for locking? Maybe, okay to keep doing that in > debug builds though. Also, are the discrepancies like this to be > considered bugs of the existing logic? I got the impression Tom was just leaving that in for a while to let the buildfarm verify the new code is getting the same lock level as the old code. Of course, I might be wrong. -- David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: