Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning

On 31 October 2017 at 21:43, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> Attached updated version of the patches addressing some of your comments
> above and fixing a bug that Rajkumar reported [1].  As mentioned there,
> I'm including here a patch (the 0005 of the attached) to tweak the default
> range partition constraint to be explicit about null values that it might
> contain.  So, there are 6 patches now and what used to be patch 0005 in
> the previous set is patch 0006 in this version of the set.

Hi Amit,

I've been looking over this. I see the latest patches conflict with
cf7ab13bf. Can you send patches rebased on current master?

Thanks

-- David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers