Re: Super PathKeys (Allowing sort order through precision loss functions)
От | David Rowley |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Super PathKeys (Allowing sort order through precision loss functions) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAKJS1f-mCJ5RdkhyCPa8Vrrts6cS3mD1gteOtoZ5fgM+C5UB9Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Super PathKeys (Allowing sort order through precision lossfunctions) (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Super PathKeys (Allowing sort order through precision lossfunctions)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 1 November 2018 at 12:11, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > I still have trouble imagining what exactly would the function do to > determine if the optimization can be applied to substr() and similar > collation-dependent cases. I guess the function would have to check for a Const offset of 0, and a collection, perhaps of "C" for the 1st arg. In any case, I wouldn't want this idea to be hung up on the fact we can't determine how to make substr() work correctly with it. I'm most interested in date_trunc() and friends. A first cut implementation would not have to implement functions for everything that's possible to implement. -- David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: