Re: pg_dump multi VALUES INSERT
От | David Rowley |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump multi VALUES INSERT |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAKJS1f-j13OOeg2ZFgA5jcprBpsYS0UXdJdYTUuAhnGCSW244A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dump multi VALUES INSERT (Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dump multi VALUES INSERT
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 02:13, Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000@gmail.com> wrote: > okay .thank you for explaining. i attach a patch corrected as such I did a bit of work to this to fix a bunch of things: 1. Docs for --rows-per-insert didn't mention anything about a parameter. 2. You'd not followed the alphabetical order of how the parameters are documented. 3. Various parts of the docs claimed that --inserts just inserted 1 row per statement. Those needed to be updated. 4. New options out of order in --help. The rest were in alphabetical order. 5. DumpOptions struct variable was not in the right place. It was grouped in with some parameterless options. 6. Code in dumpTableData_insert() was convoluted. Not sure what you had added end_of_statement for or why you were checking PQntuples(res) == 0. You'd also made the number_of_row variable 1-based and set it to 1 when we had added 0 rows. You then checked for the existence of 1 row by checking the variable was > 1... That made very little sense to me. I've pretty much put back the code that I had sent to you previously, just without the part where I split the row building code out into another function. 7. A comment in dumpTableData_insert() claimed that the insertStmt would end in "VALUES(", but it'll end in "VALUES ". I had updated that in my last version, but you must have missed that. 8. I've made it so --rows-per-insert implies --inserts. This is aligned with how --column-inserts behaves. I changed a few other things. I simplified the condition that raises an error when someone does --on-conflict-do-nothing without the --inserts option. There was no need to check for the other options that imply --inserts since that will already be enabled if one of the other options has. I also removed most of the error checking you'd added to ensure that the --rows-per-insert parameter was a number. I'd have kept this but I saw that we do nothing that special for the compression option. I didn't see why --rows-per-insert was any more special. It was quite a bit of code for very little reward. -- David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: