Re: using index or check in ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL
| От | David Rowley |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: using index or check in ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAKJS1f-Y2CAV7y_Vay_bmE=oyZPgtm2qXRinozYOJ0SeopjYtw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: using index or check in ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: using index or check in ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2 May 2019 at 14:22, David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 2 May 2019 at 13:08, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > > > Not a blocker perhaps, but it's better if we can get new behavior to > > be more or less right the first time. > > It's not really new behaviour though. The code in question is for > ATTACH PARTITION and was added in c31e9d4bafd (back in 2017). > bbb96c3704c is the commit for using constraints to speed up SET NOT > NULL. The mention of using the constraint for proof was made DEBUG1 in > the initial commit. What we need to decide is if we want to make > ATTACH PARTITION's INFO message a DEBUG1 in pg12 or not. FWIW, I'm in favour of changing ATTACH PARTITION's INFO messages to DEBUG1 for PG12 to align it to what bbb96c3704c did. Anyone else? -- David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: