Re: pgsql: Clarify use of temporary tables within partition trees
От | David Rowley |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: Clarify use of temporary tables within partition trees |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAKJS1f-SB+cAgS82KNYcBbiHR=NYFpx8s9J6+B01vdWOeeDrqw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: Clarify use of temporary tables within partition trees (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: Clarify use of temporary tables within partition trees
|
Список | pgsql-committers |
On 3 July 2018 at 21:15, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > Yeah. Actually I'd like to add a test as well to test the recursion > call of expand_partitioned_rtentry. If you have an idea, please let me > know or I'll figure out one by myself and add it probably in > create_table.sql. What specifically do you want to test? There are plenty of partitioned tests with sub-partitioned tables. Going by [1], there's no shortage of coverage. Of course, the dead code I'm proposing we remove is not covered. There's no way to cover it... it's dead. [1] https://coverage.postgresql.org/src/backend/optimizer/prep/prepunion.c.gcov.html -- David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: