Re: BUG #13920: pg_try_advisory_xact_lock bigint trouble
От | David G. Johnston |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #13920: pg_try_advisory_xact_lock bigint trouble |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAKFQuwbq_y=b1xB9Phusvf5tOqs2RbFYW8E2_gL4r5cdJzd0Cg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #13920: pg_try_advisory_xact_lock bigint trouble ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #13920: pg_try_advisory_xact_lock bigint trouble
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Monday, February 8, 2016, David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday, February 5, 2016, <mtakvel@gmail.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','mtakvel@gmail.com');>> wrote: > >> The following bug has been logged on the website: >> >> Bug reference: 13920 >> Logged by: Valeriy >> Email address: mtakvel@gmail.com >> PostgreSQL version: 9.5.0 >> Operating system: Ubuntu >> Description: >> >> Hello, I have few high load big tables. My logic calls >> pg_try_advisory_xact_lock(bitint) for locking row in current table. As I >> see >> with bigint param pg_try_advisory_xact_lock lock same ids for all my >> tables. >> Insthead lock only row in one current table. Looks like this is bug and >> will >> be cool if you fix it. >> >> > Likely working as designed. If you wish to provide an example of what you > are doing we can probably explain your misunderstanding. Basically, > though, there is nothing about the ID you pass to the advisory lock > functions that cause them to be associated with a table. The ID is simply > a number. You should try the two-key version and associate the first key > with the table (probably oid) and the second with the row on that table. > > Though the two-arg uses Integer so maybe not... You should poprobably explain your use case a bit on the -general list if you'd like to discuss alternatives. But the behavior described is how things work right now. David J.
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: