Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David G. Johnston
Тема Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command
Дата
Msg-id CAKFQuwbmAFfDw9ScCiOxK4UGf8Z8ny1nDgAn41gOJCeJ76QC4Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command  (David Zhang <david.zhang@highgo.ca>)
Ответы Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command  (David Zhang <david.zhang@highgo.ca>)
Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command  (Pavel Luzanov <p.luzanov@postgrespro.ru>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 2:31 PM David Zhang <david.zhang@highgo.ca> wrote:
There is a default built-in role `pg_monitor` and the behavior changed after the patch. If `\dg+` and `\du+` is treated as the same, and `make check` all pass, then I assume there is no test case to verify the output of `duS+`. My point is should we consider add a test case?
 
I mean, either you accept the change in how this meta-command presents its information or you don't.  I don't see how a test case is particularly beneficial.  Or, at least the pg_monitor role is not special in this regard.  Alice changed too and you don't seem to be including it in your complaint.

David J.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David Zhang
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command
Следующее
От: Zheng Li
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Support logical replication of DDLs