Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command
| От | David G. Johnston |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAKFQuwbmAFfDw9ScCiOxK4UGf8Z8ny1nDgAn41gOJCeJ76QC4Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command (David Zhang <david.zhang@highgo.ca>) |
| Ответы |
Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command
Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 2:31 PM David Zhang <david.zhang@highgo.ca> wrote:
There is a default built-in role `pg_monitor` and the behavior changed after the patch. If `\dg+` and `\du+` is treated as the same, and `make check` all pass, then I assume there is no test case to verify the output of `duS+`. My point is should we consider add a test case?
I mean, either you accept the change in how this meta-command presents its information or you don't. I don't see how a test case is particularly beneficial. Or, at least the pg_monitor role is not special in this regard. Alice changed too and you don't seem to be including it in your complaint.
David J.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: