Re: infinite recursion detected in rules for relation
| От | David G Johnston |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: infinite recursion detected in rules for relation |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAKFQuwbdtNaTW0rf4V2eKY-tF4VH8H9xCJz+mQQvbgGpRvDhDg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: infinite recursion detected in rules for relation (pinker <pinker@onet.eu>) |
| Ответы |
Re: infinite recursion detected in rules for relation
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
User created rules are almost never the correct solution. There are too many cavets and views can accomplish nearly everything that a user might want.
View this message in context: Re: infinite recursion detected in rules for relation
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
David J.
On Friday, February 13, 2015, pinker [via PostgreSQL] <[hidden email]> wrote:
On Friday, February 13, 2015, pinker [via PostgreSQL] <[hidden email]> wrote:
hmm I wanted to show only rows that was inserted today, so instead of who='me' wanted to filter for instance where timestamp_column=CURRENT_DATE.
Yes, a view would be a solution but I thouhgt that's the case rules were made for? Isn't it?If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:http://postgresql.nabble.com/infinite-recursion-detected-in-rules-for-relation-tp5837697p5837822.html
View this message in context: Re: infinite recursion detected in rules for relation
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: