Re: alter function/procedure depends on extension
| От | David G. Johnston |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: alter function/procedure depends on extension |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAKFQuwb_QtY25feLeh=8uNdnyo1H=cN4R3vENsUwQzJP4-0xZg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: alter function/procedure depends on extension (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: alter function/procedure depends on extension
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 8:49 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes:
> - A function that's marked as dependent on an extension is automatically
> - dropped when the extension is dropped.
> + A function that's marked as dependent on an extension is skipped during
> + dependency checking in restrict mode <xref linkend="sql-dropextension"/>.
That is absolutely not an improvement. The proposed replacement text
is about as clear as mud.
+ A function that's marked as dependent on an extension is dropped when the extension is dropped, even if cascade is not specified.
I suppose that is a wordier way to say "automatically" but referencing the actual command keyword seems beneficial.
David J.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: