Re: text fields and performance for ETL
| От | David G. Johnston |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: text fields and performance for ETL |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAKFQuwbX37AwNcKHMeaOq+LS_nhw_6sHwaUK1+UsQ8Nuo7bcfg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | RE: text fields and performance for ETL (Grega Jesih <Grega.Jesih@actual-it.si>) |
| Ответы |
RE: text fields and performance for ETL
|
| Список | pgsql-docs |
On Thursday, November 4, 2021, Grega Jesih <Grega.Jesih@actual-it.si> wrote:
So why would it then be published ? Because inexperienced programmers take your statement that "it's the same performance" from a wrong perspective, so it would be fair to note, that the remark "it's the same performance" is meant "within any operation inside Postgres database". In the moment we want to take this data elsewhere,
the problematic lack of model design comes out.
If you wish to supply an actual patch for consideration I’d review it. Absent that the documentation serves the vast majority of readers well as-is. We’re entitled to a bit of self-centeredness here, especially when the broader world is so varied.
David J.
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: