Re: [BUGS] BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table
| От | David G. Johnston |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAKFQuwb+7YXpfs1SFzRh7i-UrNC0=R8eHhFGCL6S=OaMQLU1vg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 11:25 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
>> Actually, the docs could be more polished.
>
> I think the docs could stand to be rewritten from scratch ;-). But
> upthread there was an offer to work on them if we made the code behavior
> saner. I've done the latter part, I don't want to do the former.
I have finally given a shot at improving the docs with the attached.
Comments are welcome.
It would be nice to give guidance on selecting a bit size for columns and a signature length. Yes, Wikipedia covers the topic but to get the reader started some discussion of the relevant trade-offs when using larger numbers than the default would be nice. I don't suspect using smaller the default values is apt to be worthwhile...
David J.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: