Re: documentation structure
| От | David G. Johnston |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: documentation structure |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAKFQuwawj_Ow_a_aD7vfi6hYtnv5+BiQYSKN8cV7ZPo8qNF9xQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: documentation structure (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: documentation structure
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 5:47 PM Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org> wrote:
>> IMO the file name should match the ID of the sect1 element with the leading
>> "functions-" removed, naming the directory "functions". Thus when viewing
>> the web page the corresponding sgml file is determinable.
>
> I'd go for shorter myself (ie "func/"), mainly due to the precedent
> of the existing subdirectory which is "ref/" not "reference/".
> It's hardly a big deal though.
I don't have strong preference neither but I agree that "func/" is
more consistent with existing subdirectory names.
Works for me. I was definitely on the fence between the two.
David J.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: