Re: Change JOIN tutorial to focus more on explicit joins
| От | David G. Johnston |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Change JOIN tutorial to focus more on explicit joins |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAKFQuwauhGRnwqGamn6oHrdP-3v2SR0ELhe_a3w0BtjpkV5q_g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Change JOIN tutorial to focus more on explicit joins (Jürgen Purtz <juergen@purtz.de>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Change JOIN tutorial to focus more on explicit joins
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 1:15 PM Jürgen Purtz <juergen@purtz.de> wrote:
On 30.11.20 20:45, Anastasia Lubennikova wrote:
> As far as I see something got committed and now the discussion is stuck in arguing about parenthesis.
> FWIW, I think it is a matter of personal taste. Maybe we can compromise on simply leaving this part unchanged.
With or without parenthesis is a little more than a personal taste, but
it's a very tiny detail. I'm happy with either of the two variants.
Sorry, I managed to overlook the most recent patch.
I admitted my use of parentheses was incorrect and I don't see anyone else defending them. Please remove them.
Minor typos:
"the database compare" -> needs an "s" (compares)
"In this case, the definition how to compare their rows." -> remove, redundant with the first sentence
"The results from the older implicit syntax, and the newer explicit JOIN/ON syntax, are identical" -> move the commas around to what is shown here
David J.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: