Re: dblink Future support vs FDW
| От | David G. Johnston |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: dblink Future support vs FDW |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAKFQuwamArNEe-EVA-sVVLuerJ4EWt54wkZWRApobCE1yi360Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | dblink Future support vs FDW (Dhritman Roy <dhritman.roy@NetCracker.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Thursday, June 27, 2024, Dhritman Roy <dhritman.roy@netcracker.com> wrote:
This is my attempt to seek support at PostGreSQL.So, if I have broken any protocols/rules or violated any code of conduct then please do forgive and guide me. Thanks.
The G is not capitalized.
I know we can use FDW but our teams are right now considering dblink ( it seems it is more performant when compared to FDW ) and we obviously do not want to end up in a situation where we develop something in few months and then we find that the PostGreSQL support is ending with a new version.
There is no deprecation note and they have co-existed for years now. Lacking the former, it isn’t going to just be removed for no reason, and there presently exists no reason to remove it. I cannot predict the future though. But IME it is exceedingly unlikely to happen.
David J.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: