Re: New version numbering practices
| От | David G. Johnston |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: New version numbering practices |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAKFQuwaOvDTyVs3Z1QxJTsaPjDC-BVVitnxAC9qPxNhRNSRwNQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: New version numbering practices (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: New version numbering practices
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Over the past couple of months I have already found myself
writing "10.0" or "9.7^H^H^H10" to make it clear that I meant the next
release version, because just "10" seemed too ambiguous.
I thought that was just (and maybe some instances were) humor regarding the general indecisiveness on the issue.
Maybe I'm
worried about nothing and the ambiguity mostly came from our not having
settled the two-or-three-part-version-number question, but I'm not sure.
I think this dynamic will sort itself out.
I suspect I'll end up using 10.x somewhat frequently though I'm mostly on the lists. I suspect the choice will be dependent on context and channel.
David J.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: