Re: CALL and named parameters
| От | David G. Johnston |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: CALL and named parameters |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAKFQuwaGO-pmBVc2Vk9vwmbkhNpxHeZM77=oCtG+Duoc-G58cg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: CALL and named parameters (Dominique Devienne <ddevienne@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: CALL and named parameters
Re: CALL and named parameters Re: CALL and named parameters |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Thursday, August 7, 2025, Dominique Devienne <ddevienne@gmail.com> wrote:
What's not nice is in the way it failed IMHO. I guess I persist it's
not a user friendly message :)
Then write the error message you would have liked to see.
Can you overload a function solely by changing an argument name?
No, the signature is only the name and input argument types.
If not, as I suspect, then function lookup doesn't strictly depend on
argument names (like in C++).
So the function did exist, with the correct "signature" (ignoring
argument names).
And I was "just" using the wrong arg-name. That tripped me up.
How is it “just” an argument name when you are using named argument syntax?
David J.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: