Re: unexpected psql "feature"
| От | David G. Johnston |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: unexpected psql "feature" |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAKFQuwaADV-WyLtpB455J_MZ6bT8A6Ld6SU1Zya+Zajejm1JtQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: unexpected psql "feature" (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>) |
| Ответы |
Re: unexpected psql "feature"
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Tom,Although "\;" behavior is not documented, I would have expected both
results to be shown one after the other, or having a an error, but not a
quiet discard.
See the documentation for PQexec(): all but the last query result is
discarded.
Sure. That is developer-level answer to "why", although it does not really say why the developer chose PQexex over PQsendQuery. At the user-level the behavior is still pretty surprising.
Lets try putting it this way...
As a psql user I want some way to choose whether I send my query via "PQexec" or "PQsendQuery". I'm not sure why the "PQexec" access point is undocumented but this "\;" syntax, vis-a-vis ";" provides me that choice.
David J.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: