Re: Changed SRF in targetlist handling
| От | David G. Johnston |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Changed SRF in targetlist handling |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAKFQuwa9_UCyTrJ+znOdRy=HhUR2sBjZkQWrLC2GaLniKWuxDg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Changed SRF in targetlist handling (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Changed SRF in targetlist handling
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> > I'll also note that, unless I missed something, we also have to consider
> > that the capability to pipeline results is still only available in the
> > target list.
>
> Yes, we would definitely want to improve nodeFunctionscan.c to perform
> better for ValuePerCall SRFs. But that has value independently of this.
Ah, so that's what "pipeline results" mean! I hadn't gotten that. I
agree; Abhijit had a patch or a plan for this, a long time ago ...
Is this sidebar strictly an implementation detail, not user visible?
David J.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: