Re: Dangerous Naming Confusion
| От | David G. Johnston |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Dangerous Naming Confusion |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAKFQuwa9MyYhhdJEp0GROQ+7VNo6P679pbWJ0nbZnZ4_H3O8sA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Dangerous Naming Confusion (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Dangerous Naming Confusion
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 3:20 PM Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote:
On 3/29/21 3:00 PM, Don Seiler wrote:
>
> I'm wondering if this is expected behavior that PG uses the
> dts_orders.order_id value in the subquery "select order_id from
> dts_temp" when dts_temp doesn't have its own order_id column. I would
> have expected an error that the column doesn't exist. Seems very
> counter-intuitive to think PG would use a column from a different table.
See:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/Pine.LNX.4.56.0308011345320.881@krusty.credativ.de
There is also an FAQ entry:
David J.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: