Re: We broke the defense against accessing other sessions' temp tables
| От | David G. Johnston |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: We broke the defense against accessing other sessions' temp tables |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAKFQuwa7dtfe_EUWRKd2m4Tq5+1dpkpJeS2-2GRLE_WbDutW4g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: We broke the defense against accessing other sessions' temp tables (Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>) |
| Ответы |
Re: We broke the defense against accessing other sessions' temp tables
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Sep 21, 2025 at 12:19 PM Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl> wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sept 2025 at 19:44, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Yeah, if it were 18-only we'd need a powwow about whether to break
> release freeze. But since it's been there since 17 and nobody
> noticed, I'm content to wait till after 18.0 to fix it.
People definitely noticed[1], but I agree that there's no reason to
rush this fix out before the 18 release.
Patch looks good, but obviously needs some tests.
[1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAMEv5_syU0ZopE-2Wr8A8QksqrCyYT2hW06Rgw4RSPdyJO-%3Dfw%40mail.gmail.com
I'm presuming this report is also about the same underlying issue.
It too has a patch included.
David J.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: