Re: Add a new table for Transaction Isolation?

On Wednesday, April 15, 2015, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:

On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 08:00:38PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/transaction-iso.html
>
> Table 13-1 shows the SQL standard isolation levels and what is and is not
> guaranteed.  Then the text goes on to explain how our implementation differs
> from that table.  Is there any opposition to actually adding a similar table,
> 13-2, probably right after the paragraph, with the same columns, three rows,
> and the corresponding possible/not-possible cell values?

Yes, it does make sense to have a table that properly matches the
Postgres implementation.   Should I write a patch or would you like to?