Re: Precedence of standard comparison operators
| От | David G. Johnston |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Precedence of standard comparison operators |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAKFQuwZpkRCW9rjRjYaDaD37Lm_ATt+pbvrGZEDXrKURk_puzQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Precedence of standard comparison operators (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Precedence of standard comparison operators
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Do we have consensus on doing this? Should we have the warning on
> by default, or off?
I vote for defaulting the warning to off. If that proves to be too
problematic, I'd take that as a sign that this whole change is not as
low-impact as we're hoping, and maybe consider a rethink.
Do we want to have three states? On, Off, and Auto? We can then change what Auto means in a point-release while letting people who have chosen On or Off have their wish.
Auto could also consider some other data - like how long ago the database was initialized...
I would vote for Auto meaning On in the .0 release.
David J.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: