Re: doc: Clarify Savepoint Behavior
От | David G. Johnston |
---|---|
Тема | Re: doc: Clarify Savepoint Behavior |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAKFQuwZmDJhyUQunRgwrm2J6Y5Cg=RKo0cNqVt53cFFfT2AOdQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: doc: Clarify Savepoint Behavior (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 12:44 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
On Sat, Jul 9, 2022 at 12:59:23PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 09:14:56AM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> > So leave the "release" behavior implied from the rollback behavior?
> >
> > On the whole I'm slightly in favor of your proposed wording (mostly due to the
> > better fitting of the ROLLBACK command, though at the omission of RELEASE...)
> > but are you seeing anything beyond personal style as to why you feel one is
> > better than the other? Is there some existing wording in the docs that I
> > should be conforming to here?
>
> I have developed the attached patch based on the discussion here. I
> tried to simplify the language and example to clarify the intent.
>
> I was confused why the first part of the patch added a mention of
> releasing savepoints to the ROLLBACK TO manual page --- I have removed
> that and improved the text in RELEASE SAVEPOINT.
Patch applied to all supported versions.
Bruce,
Thanks for committing this and the other patches. Should I go into the commitfest and mark the entries for these as committed or does protocol dictate I remind you and you do that?
David J.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: