Re: Best tools to monitor and fine tune postgres
От | David G. Johnston |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Best tools to monitor and fine tune postgres |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAKFQuwZPY3vmVCq5faYBB=Q059WBpaakfGmsn+Ks+Fed0_AK6A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Best tools to monitor and fine tune postgres (Christophe Pettus <xof@thebuild.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 1:53 PM Christophe Pettus <xof@thebuild.com> wrote:
This conversation doesn't really have anything to do with monitoring and fine-tuning PostgreSQL, at this point, does it? It might be appropriate to let go the meta-discussion when each individual person thinks it is appropriate to answer a question.
Actually, on the whole it is admirably on-topic as to how what seems like such a simple question from a newcomer's perspective is perceived by those on the list to whom that question is being posed. With a number of the responses giving indirect answers to the question since it, as has been established, is a common question with answers available from sources other than volunteers writing new emails or searching themselves for old replies.
On a thread of interest to newcomers it seems like a reasonably productive spot to describe the reality, which is what is being done here - not providing excuses. We aren't apologetic for these realities, while understanding that improvement is possible (if hard to achieve - technical and personal).
David J.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: