Re: 10.0
| От | David G. Johnston |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: 10.0 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAKFQuwZO1xTAdxCD1+SMAZC1Y4wLwESC6N3biRiYhgj6fT4--g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: 10.0 (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 4:00 PM, David G. Johnston
<david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
> 10.x is the desired output.
10.x is the output that some people desire. A significant number of
people, including me, would prefer to stick with the current
three-part versioning scheme, possibly with some change to the
algorithm for bumping the first digit (e.g. every 5 years like
clockwork).
I was speaking for the project/community as a distinct entity and not about any individual contributor. I'm acting as if we're past the point of individual opinions and votes on the decision to go to a two-part versioning scheme.
We will still welcome any major revelations that may have gone unconsidered during the decision making but I find that to be unlikely.
David J.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: