Re: Bug in to_timestamp().
От | David G. Johnston |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bug in to_timestamp(). |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAKFQuwZKtS0Ad=a1E9_mkdYwLMq+JA3YjmhCvjJ1JF+3BU8a0g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bug in to_timestamp(). (Alex Ignatov <a.ignatov@postgrespro.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bug in to_timestamp().
Re: Bug in to_timestamp(). |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 23.06.2016 16:30, Bruce Momjian wrote:On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 07:41:26AM +0000, amul sul wrote:On Monday, 20 June 2016 8:53 PM, Alex Ignatov <a.ignatov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:Well, the user specifies the format string, while the input string comesWe do consume extra space from input string, but not if it is in format string, see below:On 13.06.2016 18:52, amul sul wrote:And it wont stop on some simple whitespace. By using to_timestamp you
can get any output results by providing illegal input parameters values:
postgres=# SELECT TO_TIMESTAMP('2016-06-13 99:99:99', 'YYYYMMDD
HH24:MI:SS');
to_timestamp
------------------------
2016-01-06 14:40:39+03
(1 row)
postgres=# SELECT TO_TIMESTAMP('2016-06-13 15:43:36', 'YYYY/MM/DD HH24:MI:SS');
to_timestamp
------------------------
2016-06-13 15:43:36-07
(1 row)
We should have same treatment for format string too.
Thoughts? Comments?
from the data, so I don't see having them behave the same as necessary.
To be honest they not just behave differently. to_timestamp is just incorrectly handles input data and nothing else.There is no excuse for such behavior:
postgres=# SELECT TO_TIMESTAMP('20:-16-06:13: 15_43:!36', 'YYYY/MM/DD HH24:MI:SS');
to_timestamp
------------------------------
0018-08-05 13:15:43+02:30:17
(1 row)
T
o be honest I don't see how this is relevant to quoted content. And you've already made this point quite clearly - repeating it isn't constructive. This behavior has existed for a long time and I don't see that changing it is a worthwhile endeavor. I believe a new function is required that has saner behavior. Otherwise given good input and a well-formed parse string the function does exactly what it is designed to do. Avoid giving it garbage and you will be fine. Maybe wrap the call to the in a function that also checks for the expected layout and RAISE EXCEPTION if it doesn't match.
David J.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: