Re: Naming of network_ops vs. inet_ops for SP-GIST
| От | David G. Johnston |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Naming of network_ops vs. inet_ops for SP-GIST |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAKFQuwZ6+q9Qs9NNmAJvW1k6bDaALvUv9c++SaHYtRFUG1_EFA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Naming of network_ops vs. inet_ops for SP-GIST (PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>) |
| Список | pgsql-docs |
Michael, please see below:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:44 PM PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org> wrote:
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/spgist-builtin-opclasses.html
Description:
I wanted to add an SP-GIST index for an inet field ip_address
In https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/spgist-builtin-opclasses.html
network_ops is stated as the built-in opclass for (inet, inet)
[...]
I notice inet_ops, not network_ops, is mentioned in the docs for 13. Perhaps
it was renamed to network_ops in 15 but not 14?
I'm fairly certain this is a simple typo while performing some refactoring work here:
doc/src/sgml/spgist.sgml
L105 + <entry valign="middle" morerows="10"><literal>network_ops</literal></entry>
L185 - <entry><literal>inet_ops</literal></entry>
David J.
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: