Re: BUG #13880: Different procedures in same SQL
От | David G. Johnston |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #13880: Different procedures in same SQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAKFQuwYx3ay+Gbsm_kbnBoHG0uGRUwW-GFT_spCnnWZ3jzkjEQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BUG #13880: Different procedures in same SQL (victor.evangelista@caixa.gov.br) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 9:53 AM, <victor.evangelista@caixa.gov.br> wrote: > The following bug has been logged on the website: > > Bug reference: 13880 > Logged by: Victor Neves > Email address: victor.evangelista@caixa.gov.br > PostgreSQL version: 9.1.9 > Operating system: RedHat 4.4.7 x64 > Description: > > I found a different procedures in same SQL, in postgres 9.1.9. > > I create a table, but i dont insert any data, after execute > > insert into <table> (namecolum1, namecolum2, namecolum3, namecolum4) > select distinct 'value1', 'value2', 'value3', 'value4' > from <table> where not exists (select 1 from <table> sis where > sis.namecolum2=3D'value2' ) > > Postgres says: "Query returned successfully: 0 rows affected, 1 ms > execution > time." > > But if I insert any data in the table and execute the SQL again, the inse= rt > works fine! > > If I truncate the table and execute de SQL, postgres says "0 rows affecte= d" > again. > > =E2=80=8BYeah, if "<table>" is empty then a query having "<table>" in its F= ROM clause will return zero records. Period. That fact that you add "DISTINCT 'literal' AS col" won't change that. David J.=E2=80=8B
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: