Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order?
| От | David G. Johnston |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAKFQuwYeVeBenFaKx+CBoPVm1QxuytfTso6F1pBbRqm_y333Zg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 8:38 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes:
> ... I was going for the html effect
> of having these views chunked into their own pages, any other changes being
> non-detrimental.
But is that a result we want? It will for example break any bookmarks
that people might have for these documentation entries. It will also
pretty thoroughly break the cross-version navigation links in this
part of the docs.
Maybe the benefit is worth those costs, but I'm entirely not convinced
of that. I think we need to tread pretty lightly when rearranging
longstanding documentation-layout decisions.
Fair points.
The external linking can be solved with redirect rules, as I believe we've done before, and fairly recently. Even if not I think when they see why the break happened they will be happy for the improved user experience.
I do think it is important enough a change to warrant breaking the cross-version navigation links. I can imagine a linking scheme that would still work but I'm doubtful that this is important enough to expend the development effort.
David J.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: