Re: Statistics Import and Export
От | Greg Sabino Mullane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Statistics Import and Export |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAKAnmmKzJQxWLmkBTgCZ-N_0SonudWxbmAq=cwbV-wz83JoFNA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Statistics Import and Export (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Statistics Import and Export
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Mar 1, 2025 at 4:23 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
That particular argument needs to be rejected vociferously.
Okay, I will concede that part of my argument. And for the record, I've written pg_dump output parsing programs many times over the years, and seen others in the wild. It's not uncommon as some in this thread think.
What other part of pg_dump's output is not produced by default?
None, but that's kind of the point - this is a very special class of data (so much so, that we've been arguing about where it fits in our usual pre/data/post paradigm). So I don't think it's unreasonable that something this unique (and non-deterministic) gets excluded by default. It's still only a flag away if people require it.
Cheers,
Greg
--
Crunchy Data - https://www.crunchydata.com
Enterprise Postgres Software Products & Tech Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: