Re: WAL segmentes names in wrong order?
| От | Tom DalPozzo |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: WAL segmentes names in wrong order? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAK77FCQ1MP3_5YkMaRdZtOv58k_MHGfXh4tcqwq_uoizHfFQ=A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: WAL segmentes names in wrong order? (hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: WAL segmentes names in wrong order?
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Hi,
so if I understand right, the ...DE file's previous name, was less than ...C6, then it was renamed in big advance for later use. I was missing this advance.
Thanks!
Pupillo
2016-11-03 11:45 GMT+01:00 hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com>:
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 11:28:57AM +0100, Tom DalPozzo wrote:
> What am I missing?
David already explained, but you might want to read also:
https://www.depesz.com/2011/07/14/write-ahead-log- understanding-postgresql-conf- checkpoint_segments- checkpoint_timeout-checkpoint_ warning/
depesz
--
The best thing about modern society is how easy it is to avoid contact with it.
http://depesz.com/
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: