Re: Incomplete compatibility information for triggers
От | Josh Kupershmidt |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Incomplete compatibility information for triggers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAK3UJRH53ikaqRfubJ9sisgX=eTVvQkd40Bq8RwJ9JeEkeYrYQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Incomplete compatibility information for triggers (Louis-Claude Canon <louis-claude.canon@femto-st.fr>) |
Ответы |
Re: Incomplete compatibility information for triggers
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Louis-Claude Canon <louis-claude.canon@femto-st.fr> wrote: > Le 14/11/2012 05:23, Josh Kupershmidt a écrit : > >> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Louis-Claude Canon >> <louis-claude.canon@femto-st.fr> wrote: >> >>> the compatibility section of the "create trigger" page >>> (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/sql-createtrigger.html) >>> claims >>> that a missing functionality is the ability to define aliases for the >>> "old" >>> and "new" rows or tables. If I am understanding this correctly, another >>> related missing functionality is that PostgreSQL does not allow the old >>> and >>> new tables to be referenced for statement-level triggers (i.e., the "OLD >>> TABLE" that contains all the deleted/modified rows in case of >>> deletion/update). I think this is also worth noting as any workaround for >>> it >>> seems to be more difficult (if possible at all) than for the missing >>> alias >>> feature. >> >> +1, it seems like a useful missing piece from the SQL:2011 standard. >> Care to send a documentation patch? > > > Let me know if it requires a second round. A (belated) +1 for this patch. There were two small typos which I've fixed in the attached version. You may want to add this patch soon to the 2013-01 CommitFest so it doesn't get lost. > By the way, I can propose another patch regarding the transaction isolation > relatively to my previous post on pgsql-bugs. If that doc change hasn't been made yet, you may want to post a patch. Josh
Вложения
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: