Re: bugfix: --echo-hidden is not supported by \sf statements
От | Josh Kupershmidt |
---|---|
Тема | Re: bugfix: --echo-hidden is not supported by \sf statements |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAK3UJRF_Cb-WyvZmpCfCy4kS3gg7hx4w2rs_4svvaas09pE4qg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: bugfix: --echo-hidden is not supported by \sf statements (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: bugfix: --echo-hidden is not supported by \sf
statements
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote: > Josh, > > * Josh Kupershmidt (schmiddy@gmail.com) wrote: >> I still think this patch is an improvement over the status quo, and is >> committable as-is. Yes, the patch doesn't address the existing >> ugliness with minimal_error_message() and sidestepping PSQLexec(), but >> at least it fixes the --echo-hidden behavior, and the various other >> issues may be handled separately. > > Which patch, exactly, are you referring to wrt this..? I'm less than > convinced that it's in a committable state, but I'd like to make sure > that we're talking about the same thing here... Sorry, this second version posted by Pavel: http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFj8pRB3-Tov5s2dCGshp+Vedyk9s97d7hn7rDMmw9Ztrj-7tg@mail.gmail.com Josh
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: