Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays
От | Mark Rofail |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAJvoCuuzAv1Rrkhokqk2Tt-pFb3rOmuEs9eCXXQvUzNZwEFYrg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays ("Joel Jacobson" <joel@compiler.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Joel,
Thank you for your kind words and happy that you benefited from this patch.
Thank you for your kind words and happy that you benefited from this patch.
We simply assert that the update/delete method used is supported currently only "NO ACTION" and "RESTRICT", this can be extended in future patches without rework, just extra logic.
Please don't hesitate to give your feedback.
I would love some help with some performance comparisons if you are up to it, between Many-to-Many, Foreign Key Arrays and Gin Indexed Foreign Key Arrays.
/Mark
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 1:51 PM Joel Jacobson <joel@compiler.org> wrote:
Hi Mark,On Mon, Jan 25, 2021, at 09:14, Joel Jacobson wrote:I'll continue testing over the next couple of days and report if I find any more oddities.I've continued testing by trying to make full use of this feature in the catalog-diff-tool I'm working on.Today I became aware of a SQL feature that I must confess I've never used before,that turned out to be useful in my tool, as I then wouldn't need to follow FKsto do updates manually, but let the database do them automatically.I'm talking about "ON CASCADE UPDATE", which I see is not supported in the patch.In my tool, I could simplify the code for normal FKs by using ON CASCADE UPDATE,but will continue to need my hand-written traverse-FKs-recursively code for Foreign Key Arrays.I lived a long SQL life without ever needing ON CASCADE UPDATE,so I would definitively vote for Foreign Key Arrays to be added even without support for this.Would you say the patch is written in a way which would allow adding support for ON CASCADE UPDATElater on mostly by adding code, or would it require a major rewrite?I hesitated if I should share this with you, since I'm really grateful for this feature even without ON CASCADE UPDATE,but since this was discovered when testing real-life scenario and not some hypothetical example,I felt it should be noted that I stumbled upon this during testing.Again, thank you so much for working on this./Joel
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: