Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays
От | Mark Rofail |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAJvoCutM5tyrAWJHywk6m_iMdvqYiZuq8pN-OQTYEfbkHC4U8Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays ("Joel Jacobson" <joel@compiler.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Joel,
On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 12:11 PM Joel Jacobson <joel@compiler.org> wrote:
HINT: No operator matches the given name and argument types. You might need to add explicit type casts.QUERY: SELECT 1 WHERE (SELECT pg_catalog.count(DISTINCT y) FROM pg_catalog.unnest($1) y) OPERATOR(pg_catalog.=) (SELECT pg_catalog.count(*) FROM (SELECT 1 FROM ONLY "catalog_clone"."pg_type" x WHERE $1 OPERATOR(pg_catalog. @>) ARRAY["oid"] FOR KEY SHARE OF x) z)It seems to me there is some type conversion between oidvector and oid[] that isn't working properly?
This seems to be a type casting problem indeed. The coercion part of the patch found in "ruleutils.c:11438-11491" is the culprit, is there a cleaner way to achieve this?
I am aware of the problem and will try to fix it, but I assume this is because of "Array-containselem-gin-v1.patch" can you give the v13 patch a try alone?
I am aware of the problem and will try to fix it, but I assume this is because of "Array-containselem-gin-v1.patch" can you give the v13 patch a try alone?
I will work on a fix and send it soon.
/Mark
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: