Re: Mail thread references in commits
От | Joshua Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Mail thread references in commits |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAJvJg-SKFaqfNmFA-ALsnXMhchfijQdcrS2TQsZdvDHypByr_Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Mail thread references in commits (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
<div dir="auto">My solution requires that everything have an issue. E.g., hackers becomes a tracker.<div dir="auto"><br /></div><divdir="auto">Sincerely,</div><div dir="auto"> Jd</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br /><div class="gmail_quote">OnNov 19, 2016 09:04, "Tom Lane" <<a href="mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us">tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us</a>> wrote:<brtype="attribution" /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">"JoshuaD. Drake" <<a href="mailto:jd@commandprompt.com">jd@commandprompt.com</a>> writes:<br/> > I wonder if now is the time (again) to consider an issue tracker.<br /><br /> That would make the problemat hand worse, not better, because you'd<br /> get nothing at all for cases that were too trivial to make an issue<br/> tracker entry for, or that the committer couldn't be bothered to go<br /> find in the issue tracker. We don'teven have very widespread adherence<br /> to the cite-a-message-thread convention yet (so far as I can tell,<br /> Andresand I are the only committers doing it at all). Adding another<br /> step of bureaucracy to our processes is justgoing to fail miserably.<br /><br /> regards, tom lane<br /></blockquote></div></div>
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: